Search for: "Doe-Individuals 6-44, inclusive" Results 1 - 20 of 167
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 May 2019, 1:33 pm by Kevin Kaufman
”[6]  An open question, however, is: Does the OECD have the staffing required to do this work and can it conceivably be completed by the self-imposed deadline of January 2020? [read post]
7 Jul 2015, 1:51 pm
Such knowledge is considered a prerequisite for lack of individual character.Gerben HartmanThe GC’s main argument for inclusion of designs applied to or incorporated in other products in the novelty assessment is that a Community design gives rights enforceable against use on any product or use of any design which does not produce a different overall impression (with reference to art. 10 and 19 CDR). [read post]
26 Sep 2018, 6:55 am by Kevin Kaufman
Source: Tax Foundation Alabama 39 20 30 48 15 12 Alaska 2 25 1 5 23 35 Arizona 27 17 19 47 5 13 Arkansas 46 40 40 44 26 34 California 49 31 49 43 14 17 Colorado 18 16 14 38 12 40 Connecticut 47 29 43 30 50 23 Delaware 11 50 41 2 9 3 Florida 4 6 1 22 11 2 Georgia 33 8 38 29 24 38 Hawaii 38 14 47 24 16 26 Idaho 21 26 23 26 4 48 Illinois 36 39 13 36 45 42 Indiana 10 18 15 12 2 11 Iowa 45 48 42 19 39 33 Kansas 28 34 21 31 20 15 Kentucky 23 27 17 14 35 47 Louisiana 44 36 32 50… [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 12:49 pm
Amusingly, the fortuitous inclusion exception is recognized by French courts, even though it is not recognized by law, and the Report stated just a few lines above that French law does not recognize judicial precedent. [read post]
9 Nov 2022, 2:24 pm by Greg Lambert and Marlene Gebauer
Ronda Bazley Moore 6:40 Sure, you know, the business case around inclusion and diversity is absolutely clear. [read post]
29 Jan 2017, 4:00 am by Administrator
 British Columbia (Attorney General), 2017 SCC 6 (36495) B.C. [read post]
23 Jan 2020, 5:00 am by Kevin Kaufman
For example, the Inclusive Prosperity Act proposed by Sen. [read post]
20 Oct 2020, 9:03 pm by Kevin Kaufman
The lower rate does not change Florida’s already enviable rank of 4th overall but does improve the state’s corporate tax component rank from 9th to 6th. [read post]
15 Sep 2017, 6:17 am by Kenneth Vercammen Esq. Edison
Anti bias statutes CHAPTER 443An Act concerning bias crimes, amending P.L.1998, c.26, P.L.1979, c.179, N.J.S.2C:12-1, N.J.S.2C:33-4, N.J.S.2C:43-7, N.J.S.2C:44-1 and N.J.S.2C:44-3 and adding a new chapter 16 to the New Jersey Statutes. [read post]
16 Dec 2021, 1:50 am by Kevin Kaufman
This does not mean, however, that a state cannot rank in the top 10 while still levying all the major taxes. [read post]
25 Oct 2022, 1:50 am by Kevin Kaufman
This does not mean, however, that a state cannot rank in the top 10 while still levying all the major taxes. [read post]
21 Nov 2021, 4:01 am by Administrator
It’s a summary of all Appeals, Oral Judgments and Leaves to Appeal granted from October 21 to November 17, 2021 inclusive. [read post]
12 Aug 2023, 11:45 am by Unknown
"Modelling social inclusion, self-esteem, loneliness, psychological distress, and psychological resilience of refugees: Does hospitableness matter? [read post]
25 Jan 2021, 1:46 pm by Kevin LaCroix
In 2017, 61% of cases had settlement values of less than $10 million, compared to 44% in 2020; similarly, 24% of 2017 settled cases had settlement values between $10 million and $50 million while 40% of 2020 settled cases had individual settlements within this range. [read post]
23 Nov 2008, 8:25 am by MTTLR Blog Editor
Oct.28, 2008), (hereafter “Settlement Agreement”), available at http://books.google.com/booksrightsholders/.11 Id.12 Id.13 Id. at 42.14 Id. at 44. [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
Any regulatory changes aimed at addressing the over-inclusive aspect may worsen the under-inclusive aspect, and vice versa. [read post]
14 Oct 2016, 2:02 pm by Angelo A. Paparelli
Cahill Gordon & Reindel, 3 OCAHO no. 568, 1641, 1647 (1993), as justification for the inclusion of all non-citizens in the proposed definition of citizenship status. [read post]
25 Jul 2023, 11:09 am by freda
On August 6, 2021, the Government of Canada announced that it would implement a mandatory requirement for federal departments and agencies to ensure a minimum of five percent of the total value of federal contracts are held by Indigenous businesses (the 5% target is calculated as a percentage of the aggregated value of contracts awarded and not as a percentage of the value of each individual contract awarded). [read post]